THE WEAKEST LINK

 


     Each of us is a link in the chain of humanity. At times, it can seem a tug of war as one is pulled in one direction or another by the other links in the chain. A chain is only as strong as the weakest link. When undo stress is put on the weakest link, the chain breaks.

      Why aren't all links equally strong? What causes one link to be stronger than another? Is it the chain itself which keeps some links from becoming strong? What purpose does a chain provide? The chains we are likely to come in contact with in our lives were all made by mankind. Is the purpose of a chain to lock something up? Is a strong chain better than a weaker chain?

     In a "democratic" belief system where the majority rules, any minority belief system which exists within the society is without voice. Thus, the society as a whole might seem cohesive, but this might not actually be the case from the point of view of any minority member.

     If ones political system was subject to votes where decisions were made only when there was unanimity, then the overriding belief system would be subject to, and only as strong as the most aberrant belief. What's more, it would take too long to make decisions.

     However, in a society where every person can vote, but where the majority rules, society is not limited to the weakest link, but to the common link. In other words, the common belief rules. This common link may not be in a position to have and/or understand all the information necessary to make the best decision. In other words, some of the links being left out of the chain may be the strongest ones. What's worse is that a minority of powerful, or wealthy, links who control the media can "brainwash" the majority of common voters through advertising propaganda in order to get them to vote exactly as they please. Ironically, most politicians today are millionaires, hardly representative of their constituents.

     When the common link rules, then the expert, most educated, and most intelligent of the links are also excluded for they too, are a minority. To solve this problem, many countries have created a representational democracy, or republic. Theoretically, voting the expert links into office will allow them to be the real links in the chain, making decisions for the "common good". In such a system, the fringes, minorities, and different links have never had a voice because they are not the majority, nor have any among them been elected as representatives of the common good. Why would they? They don't speak for the majority!

     Unrest and dissent amongst minority groups has created a resurgence in the rise of another type of government, another type of chain, an oligopoly. Basically, links are mandated into the chain to represent members of the neglected minority groups. For instance, in the Supreme Court of America, a minority judge is usually replaced "unofficially" with another minority judge. The idea is that if representation reflects society at large, all of society will believe in the system. The new system assumes expert links can be found or created from all minority groups, and theoretically it does exclude the majority links that would be elected otherwise. This type of "affirmative action" brings a form of equality and equilibrium to a system that would otherwise exclude minority groups.

     All in all, God loves variety. Variety is natural. Look at the various plants in nature. See how beautiful it is when the entire system is at equilibrium. Although individually different, the plants live in peace and usually actually benefit from their differences. Just as we can make alloys from mixing metals which are stronger than any single metal individually, many cultures can work together for the greater good and celebrate each others freedom and individuality as long as it does not compromise essentials. In order to achieve this, each member of each culture must be able to maintain his or her identity within that culture and each culture must respect each other culture and the overall governing system. In such a system, no one will care about which link in the chain is the weakest because we will be able to do away with chains altogether.

TABLE OF CONTENTMENT